What Google Considers High quality Points: Issues Customers Think about Problematic

Google’s John Mueller defined what he would think about being a search high quality subject, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the positioning not “high quality.” John stated on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would think about to be problematic.”

He added that technical points that customers don’t see possible wouldn’t be thought of a top quality subject by Google. John stated, “dangerous rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? In all probability not.”

John additionally stated it’s common to see each high quality and technical points on the identical website however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily broad fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a top quality or a technical subject?).” “If a website has obtrusive points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make an enormous impression,” he added.

Listed below are the tweets associated to this, so you may see it in context:

And considerably associated however in a distinct thread, John wrote “Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search consequence for customers.”

So technical points and high quality points are completely different, in line with John Mueller of Google.

Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.

What's your reaction?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.